Over the past several years the FDA has issued Warning Letters to a number of aseptic processing facilities that have encountered difficulties with their management of air flow. While the management of airflow appears to be an easy area to manage within the Aseptic Processing Area (APA), the number of Warning Letters (Click Here) has suggested otherwise. The … [Read more...]
INDIAN MFG FACILITIES RECEIVE WARNING LETTER FOR PROBLEMS ASSOIATED WITH THE ASEPTIC PROCESSING AREA (APA) (102215)
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected the following two pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities: August 25-29, 2014: Sandoz Private Limited, MIDC Plot Nos. 8-A/2 & 8-B, TTC Industrial Area, Kalwe Block, Village Dinghe, Navi Mumbai 400 708, Maharashtra, India (Kalwe facility) August 12-28, 2014: Sandoz Private Limited, Plot Nos. D31 & D32, MIDC, TTC … [Read more...]
Smoke Study Findings Contribute to Mylan Laboratories Warning Letter (8/06/2015)
The following is the second Blog in an on-going series of Blogs obtained from a Warning Letter about Mylan Laboratories, Bangalore, India as well as other Mylan (Agila Specialties Private Ltd.) facilities in India. This second Blog continues the review of the Mylan facilities which were audited February 6-13, 2015 and are located at Plot No. 284-B (19A) Bommasandra Jigani Link … [Read more...]
APOTEX INC RECEIVES WARNING LETTER FOR MULTIPLE CANADIAN SITES (2/21/13)
FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND FOLLOW PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO PREVENT MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION (21 CFR 211.113(b)) The FDA, during August and October 2012 inspected two Apotex, Inc. sites. This Blog only discusses the facilities located at 150 Signet Drive, Toronto, Canada. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified significant … [Read more...]
HAMELN PHARMACEUTICALS, HAMELN, GERMANY RECEIVES WARNING LETTER (12/17/12)
IN-HOUSE STERILITY TESTING METHOD NOT EQUIVALENT TO USP<71> During the time frame of June 4 - 14, 2012, the Hameln facility was audited by the FDA. Following the audit, the firm responded on July 4, August 2 and 31, and September 8, 2012. Even with all of these responses, the FDA found that the firm lacked sufficient corrective actions. For … [Read more...]