• Home
  • About
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS & SEMINARS
  • Consultation
  • USP 61/62 FAQ
  • Contact

Barry A. Friedman, PhD LLC

FDA Regulatory Compliance for the Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology and Medical Device Arenas

BIOBURDEN CONTROL OF NONSTERILE DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS (USP)

July 25, 2013 By Barry Friedman Leave a Comment

A NEW PROPOSED USP GENERAL INFORMATION CHAPTER

USP recently released a new DRAFT in a much anticipated area that has gained significant attention over the past half dozen years.  The subject, “USP<1115> Bioburden Control of Nonsterile Drug Substances and Products”, has generated much controversy as nonsterile manufacturers have repeatedly asked the question “what degree of microbial cleanliness should I require with my nonsterile drug substances and products” and “how many microorganisms of a single genus may I have where USP<1111> has limits of either 100 or 1000 per gram”?  Efforts have been made to historically determine these questions within other USP Chapters to include USP<61>, USP<1111> and USP<1231> which have addressed both test methodologies and microbial counts allowed.  21 CFR 211 has also “weighed into” this fray with their various regulations, but have not offered solutions.  Quite often during lectures and seminars, the comment is overheard “With sterile products, it was so much simpler to provide a microbial answer” because I have definitive endpoints.

This DRAFT approaches nonsterile drug substance and bioburden control from a Risk Management perspective (ICH Q9).  It compares considerations of excessive cost and complexity vs. added value to the consumer and the product.  The DRAFT also provides microbial control considerations in an array of microbiological control areas to include manufacturing, equipment design, personnel and the overall management of a nonsterile  microbiological control program.

This DRAFT may be obtained by going to the most recent posting of Pharmacopeial Forum and/or attending a Tungsten Shield webinar on Thursday, August 15.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: FDA Compliance, Microbiological Issues, New Guidances for Industry Tagged With: 100 CFU/gm, 21 CFR 211, bioburden control, ICH Q9, nonsterile microbiology, Pharmacopeial Forum, USP 1111, USP 1231, USP 61

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New Reader? Learn More

Connect With Me:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Webinar Registration & Information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:

FDA Form 483 Frequently Asked Questions

USP General Chapter

USP General Chapter 62, Part II

TOP OBSERVATIONS:

FDA’s CDER LISTING OF TOP NINETEEN OBSERVATIONS FOR 2014

FDA CDER Most Frequent Form FDA 483 Observations Fiscal Year 2012

CDER MOST FREQUENTLY CITED DRUG OBSERVATIONS – FISCAL YEAR 2010

Top Posts:

Top Posts for 2012

Top Posts for 2013

Top Posts Year To Date

Recent Posts

  • Upcoming Microbiological Webinars
  • Microbiological Webinars
  • Microbiological Webinars 2020 (Upcoming)
  • General Chapter (USP<60>) on B. cepacia Complex to Issue December 1, 2019
  • Les Produits Chimiques B.G.R., Inc. Receives FDA Warning Letter (07/24/2018) for Failure to Perform Laboratory Testing

Categories

follow us in feedly
  • Home
  • About
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS & SEMINARS
  • Consultation
  • USP 61/62 FAQ
  • Contact
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Thank You For Visiting Barry A. Friedman, PhD LLC - 2015

Welcome To My Blog!
Please enter your name and email below to receive my newsletter.
Your information will *never* be shared or sold to a 3rd party.