• Home
  • About
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS & SEMINARS
  • Consultation
  • USP 61/62 FAQ
  • Contact

Barry A. Friedman, PhD LLC

FDA Regulatory Compliance for the Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology and Medical Device Arenas

USP FAQ – HOW ARE MICROBIAL LIMITS AND OBJECTIONABLE (SPECIFIED) MICROORGANISMS DETERMINED

July 13, 2012 By Barry Friedman Leave a Comment

COMMENT

A question that is frequently asked during consulting, webinars and seminars is how does one choose appropriate microbial limits, especially with non-sterile raw materials, intermediates and final products.  The USP Microbiological Expert Committee has considered this issue and provided Guidance.  Please read their considerations below.

In determining the appropriate microbial limit, the USP Microbiology Expert Committee considers such matters as the route of administration, the form of the product, and the source material. For example, it is never appropriate to have any microorganisms in a product intended for injection intravenously. Therefore, you will never see a microbial limit listed for such products. Instead, those products must meet the test for Sterility <71>. Other products may be in a form possessing extremely low water activity, such that microbial growth could not occur. You may not see microbial limits provided for some of those products. Many other products, such as those intended for oral administration, will have limits provided. Those limits are selected such that the risk of harm to the consumer is extremely low, while being reasonable from a manufacturing and quality control perspective. Products from botanical sources may have higher limits due to the larger bioburden associated with the raw materials. Again, the limits are set such that consumer risk is minimized without creating an untenable situation for the manufacturer. Consideration is also given to the likelihood of product spoilage. Since some products are more prone to spoilage due to microbial contamination, limits may be set lower for these. The issues discussed above also influence which, if any, specific organisms must be tested.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: FDA Compliance, Microbiological Issues, Regulatory Compliance Tagged With: botanical sources, microbial limit, oral administration, product spoilage, Sterility, water activity

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New Reader? Learn More

Connect With Me:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Webinar Registration & Information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:

FDA Form 483 Frequently Asked Questions

USP General Chapter

USP General Chapter 62, Part II

TOP OBSERVATIONS:

FDA’s CDER LISTING OF TOP NINETEEN OBSERVATIONS FOR 2014

FDA CDER Most Frequent Form FDA 483 Observations Fiscal Year 2012

CDER MOST FREQUENTLY CITED DRUG OBSERVATIONS – FISCAL YEAR 2010

Top Posts:

Top Posts for 2012

Top Posts for 2013

Top Posts Year To Date

Recent Posts

  • Upcoming Microbiological Webinars
  • Microbiological Webinars
  • Microbiological Webinars 2020 (Upcoming)
  • General Chapter (USP<60>) on B. cepacia Complex to Issue December 1, 2019
  • Les Produits Chimiques B.G.R., Inc. Receives FDA Warning Letter (07/24/2018) for Failure to Perform Laboratory Testing

Categories

follow us in feedly
  • Home
  • About
  • UPCOMING WEBINARS & SEMINARS
  • Consultation
  • USP 61/62 FAQ
  • Contact
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Thank You For Visiting Barry A. Friedman, PhD LLC - 2015

Welcome To My Blog!
Please enter your name and email below to receive my newsletter.
Your information will *never* be shared or sold to a 3rd party.